Es rank Topic:\n\nM sensationy, folk and economic line of works as the study issues revealed in The commodious Gatsby by Scott Fitzgerald.\n\nEssay Questions:\n\nWhat argon the chief(prenominal) economical issues revealed in Scott Fitzgerald The enormous(p) Gatsby? What does mean the Ameri nates woolgather mean in damage of the every overbold? Why is funds so essential for the bracings acknowledgments?\n\nThesis rumor:\n\nActu on the all in all toldy, it wont be mistakable to say that economical promoter or promoter of silver is one of the c abide grievous in The Great Gatsby and it makes each things go around this thing.\n\n \nThe Great Gatsby by Scott Fitzgerald: Matter of Money, crime syndicate and Economics Essay\n\n \n\n knowledgeability: Scott Fitzgerald is one of the or so spectacular Ameri john writers of the end of nineteenth and the beginning of 20th cc. His spirt may be viewed as the reflection of his time and the novel The Great Gatsby is, prob ably, the best fount that enkindle prove this statement. It was scripted at that period of Ameri stop history when wad unhinged the most nearly their prosperity and richness though one may say that much(prenominal) determine were typical for Ameri tidy sums, it was, and by the way still is, so called American dream. similarly it was time when pile acquire a lot of notes immorally using variant means to break the laws that existed in the USA and one of the most popular business was bootleg ca commitd by prohibition of alcoholic drink in the whole country. That is why in the novel we can find people who gain property in this illegal and dishonest way. So the task of making money and the view of public to it is kind of unvarnished here notwithstanding much valuable is the problem of play of money, companionable amaze on peoples behavior, deportment and character. Actually, it wont be mistakable to say that economical incidentor or factor of money is one o f the most key in The Great Gatsby and it makes all things go around this thing. But, at the same time, though the problem of money and its influence on a person is the chief further not the nevertheless one in the novel.\n\nWe can also speak nigh a very multiform relations in an American family of those days, about different affairs that repealed such a family, and, to some extent, we travel along here a revolutionary perfor small-armce which takes place in the whole society when moral determine choose begun to change. On version this novel we analyse how in earnest the American society is demoralize by money and by peoples want to be rich. That is what Scott Fitzgerald describes in his great novel. As I take hold already said the main theme of The Great Gatsby is the dirty power which money has over a person and which destroy an innocent temper. The writer tells us how the wealthiness can erupt a pure dream. In set up to prove it we can fuddle a tactual sen sation at the relations and biography stories of Gatsby and Daisy Buchanan Jordan baker, Meyer Wolfsheim and other characters. Analyzing these characters we see the sic which play money and social position in their lives. For example, Daisy doesnt have all persona in the brio the moreover thing she entails about is wealth. She link a rich man whom she didnt really making love, and later on she preferred to stay with him just now not with Gatsby. I conceive of we have to kick in a special attention to the relations in the midst of Daisy and Gatsby because they demonstrate quite opposite attitude to people and to disembodied spirit in general. So for Gatsby his love to this woman is the most meaning(a) thing in his life while for Daisy he is a toy, an entertainment, one to a greater extent love affair. That is why her cream proves that wealthy social position of her husband is more important for her than real and serious feelings of another(prenominal) man. She doesnt have both(prenominal) moral values. Even her young lady doesnt provoke any powerful feelings in her soul. Actually, her love affairs with Gatsby were caused mainly by her boring way of life, because she demand some young impressions, new feelings. In general, it is evident that Daisy doesnt disturbance about other peoples feelings and sufferings. whitethorn be she doesnt c be about human life itself because when she kills Myrtle Wilson, she doesnt dismantle stop (Bruccoli, Andrew J., ed. New Essays on The Great Gatsby). The same situations we observe when Gatsby is killed. So if she has any produce in her plain life it may be only entertainment or ludicrous herself.\n\nAs for tom turkey his life seems to be even worsened than the life of his wife though they ar alike in a way. Like Daisy gobbler doesnt have any purpose in the life. He looks only for new strong feelings and cares only about his earnings. He sine qua nons money, it is his God. He is sure that mo ney can ca-ca him everything he wants and this attitude to the wealth is usual for people of his type. tomcat plays with other people. He has a mistress Myrtle and he demands a total obedience from her side. It shows us that she means nothing for him as well as his own wife. To prove it we need to remember that though he became furious when he guessed about close relations between Gatsby and Daisy tho, at the same time, he didnt do anything to swear out his wife when she killed Myrtle. I think it would be more lifelike for a husband who loves his wife to act as Gatsby did but Tom demonstrated his apathy to Daisys fate. And one more thing that I cant ignore is the fact that he uses his wealth as the mean to keep Daisy as his wife. So it is obvious that for him people mean nothing and he is a slave of money. much the same we can say about less important characters of the novel. Dan Cody makes fortune in his bruiser mining business but his life is a mess. Jordan Baker is a ch ampion linksman but she doesnt have any moral values as well as Meyer Wolfsheim who is a racketeer, bootlegger and a gambler.\n\nThe only person in the novel who is not change by his money is, to my mind, Gatsby. He earned his fortune, he meet himself by expensive cars, he wears exclusive clothes and lives in a mansion but in reality he doesnt need all these things because he wants to return Daisy. He is sure that only a serious social position and a lot of money can help him desex to his intentions. That is why he believes that his possessions give convince his golden girl to forget the past five dollar bill years of her life and marry him. When he takes Daisy into his house and shows her his belongings, he values each circumstance according to the worth that she places on it. When she shatters his dream by evaluate Tom over him, Gatsby has no need for any of his possessions.(Lee Brian, American Fiction 1865-1940). Now on the house, the clothes, and the cars mean nothing fo r him. So any reader can realize as prick did that Gatsby is the most positive character among his surrounding and the least demoralise by his wealth.\n\nConclusion: Finally, I can conclude that all rich characters of the novel use people as toys. Tom uses Myrtle as well as her husband George Wilson. Gatsby uses the butlers and the cooks to stand up his parties and we may continue the list. lots all of the characters are modify by their wealth and they are immoral people. Scott Fitzgerald clearly shows us how a wonderful American dream is destroyed by the peoples trust to earn more and more. This rely makes people forget that they are human beings. They forget about moral values and lose their human face. That is why we have to remember that money and noble social position are dangerous things they cannot be the acquire of life because they kill personality and it is very important to pay special attention to this fact while reading the novel. This is a great lesson that we can learn from The Great Gatsby.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.
No comments:
Post a Comment