Pathogoras' Fragments and Hermeneutics Coursework

Pathogoras Fragments and Hermeneutics - Coursework Example The two specific interpretations that Protogoras provides in his work coroneted Fragments center somewhat two major concepts. First, is the issue of relativism, wherein man is viewed as the measure of all things. The headspring of ethics and what is near(a) and what is not is de stipulationined according to mans standards. One of the central issues in Protogoras is the question of whether rectitude can be taught at all and whether citizens can be educated to a point where they begin severe citizens. Another central theme of the book is that possessing a virtue is homogeneous to the possession of knowledge whereas doing evil is merely an expression of ignorance in a person. The idea that men who contract to do what is refreshing to them may be venturing into evil deeds and not have the self-control to breathe virtuous, is contested by Protogoras, who states that the very act of doing something pleasurable equates to being virtuous. In other words, he equates doing good to doing what one finds pleasurable. Protogoras states that the routine of tuition is centered around the acquisition of knowledge, i.e, learning to be virtuous representation in effect, learning a specific science or kind of knowledge. The two specific interpretations that Protogoras provides in his work titled Fragments center around two major concepts. First, is the issue of relativism, wherein man is viewed as the measure of all things. The question of ethics and what is good and what is not is determined according to mans standards. One of the central issues in Protogoras is the question of whether virtue can be taught at all and whether citizens can be educated to a point where they become good citizens. Another central theme of the book is that possessing a virtue is equivalent to the possession of knowledge whereas doing evil is merely an expression of ignorance in a person. The idea that men who choose to do what is pleasurable to them may be venturing into evil deeds and not have the self-control to remain virtuous, is contested by Protogoras, who states that the very act of doing something pleasurable equates to being virtuous. In other words, he equates doing good to doing what one finds pleasurable. Protogoras states that the care for of learning is centered around the acquisition of knowledge, i.e, learning to be virtuous means in effect, learning a specific science or kind of knowledge. Plato was the one who formulated the term rhetoric, because before his views were propagated, communicatory art was not well understood and the general understanding was that verbal art and dialogue was more holistic. But Pluto has highlighted how it is actually differentiated. the major issue that Plato has expounded is to clarify and render a clear difference between rhetoric and philosophy. There are differences in the teaching close logos one is the goal of seeking success and the other is the goa l of seeking the truth the spring is rhetoric and the latter is philosophy.3. A linguistic element may be both vocal and mental in nature. There is an internal concept associated with each linguistic unit, which may exist in the beware and its understanding of the linguistic element. The other is the external sound-image, which is the spoken word. Linguistic elements are the foundation of language and because the process of formulation of language is such a complex one, it is not one that easily lends itself to changes. Moreover, it forms a gross link between various generations it forms the means by which linguistic signs can be used to depict reality.