Explore the benifits and chalenges o conducting multi-paradiam Essay

search the benifits and chalenges o conducting multi-paradiam research - Essay ExampleThomas Kuhn, who is known for the discussing of meaning paradigm in his notable bookThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions, characterized paradigm as an integrated cluster of substantive concepts, variables and problems attached with identical methodological approaches and tools(p.43).Kuhn also specified the capitulums, which should be clarified within a paradigm to consider it as a valid base for a scientific research. A paradigm has to pay back what should be studied, what question and how should be asked, and also, which rules the researcher should follow to interpret obtained results. The notion of paradigm considers as the broadest unit of consensus, which serves to differentiate oneness scientific community from another. It appears to be a set of principles and axioms that relates to research process on the stage of legal sentiment of a problem up to its solution.Paradigms define and correlate theories, methods and instruments, accepted within a scientific research. Analyzing the chief(prenominal) paradigms, dominating in modern science, such as positivism, post positivism, critical theory, and constructivism, Guba and Lincoln (1994), represented their opinion ab bulge out the role of paradigms, their assumptions, and the implications of those assumptions for research. Paradigms define for the researcher what it is they are about, and what falls within and outside the limits of legitimate research (Guba and Lincoln, 1994, p. 108). The authors states that the basic beliefs that define a particular research paradigm may be summarized by the responses given to three vestigial questions the ontological question (what is the form and temper of reality), the epistemological question (what is the nature of the relationship between a researcher and the object of research), and the methodological question (how can the inquirer go about finding out whatever he/ she be lieves can be known)(pp. 105-117). From this aspect, we will analyze some of the well- known paradigms such as positivism and critical theory. Positivism. French philosopher August Comte (17981857) was the initiator of positivist paradigm, based on the philosophical ideas of card and reasoning as the of import ways of understanding reality and human behavior. According to August Comte, true(p) knowledge is based on experience of senses and can be obtained by observation and experiment. Positivistic thinkers take his scientific method for knowledge generation. The main postulates of the positivist paradigm consist in understanding of nature as an objective, true reality, which is governed by unchangeable natural laws. Nature has its stable, pre-existing patterns and order that can be discovered. Positivism considers human nature to be described from the behaviorist approach, asserting the external factors play the main role in the formation of the similar specific behavior of ev eryone, who has been influenced the same objective factors. Accurate and certain, knowledge should be described in a systematic way, and verify hypotheses that can be regarded as facts or laws. The role of research is uncovering the natural laws of reality, scientifically explaining, predicting and controlling phenomena. A researcher have to be objective, independent from influencing the subject of research, and eliminate any bias or subjective values within research. The main methods of research are empirical and experimental, structured observation, quantification or measurement. The results of research consider true, if